All Case Studies

  • Case Study 1

    Dairy Plant Europe

    Rotary filling line, PET bottle 0.5 L

    Configuration: Defoaming of dairy mixers (flavoured coffee, chocolate, caramel, fruit flavours)

    Packages

    • Bottle • 500 ml

    Key Metrics

    Filling speed increase %
    25
    Waste reduction per container ml
    4
    Reject reduction %
    60

    Benefits

    • Elimination of contamination on the cap seal, bottle and filling line zone
    • Reduced bottle rejects due to contamination (60% reduction)
    • Filling speed increase 25%
  • Case Study 2

    Dairy Plant Europe

    PET Bottle Line 1 L & 2 L

    Configuration: Defoamer positioned on the star between filler and capper

    Packages

    • Bottle • 1000 ml • 27000 → 33000 bphr • −4 ml waste
    • Bottle • 2000 ml • 25000 → 32000 bphr • −6 ml waste

    Key Metrics

    Underfill reject reduction %
    62

    Benefits

    • Eliminated contamination on the bottle caps, label and package
  • Case Study 3

    Dairy Plant Europe

    PET Bottle Line 1 L & 2 L

    Key Metrics

    Filling speed increase % range
    5–50
    Extract loss reduction ml range
    1–5
    Reject reduction % range
    10–80

    Benefits

    • Reduced waste from dairy over-foaming
    • Significant reduction in contamination on bottle & can package and packaging line
    • Hygiene improvements
    • Quality improvements
  • Case Study 4

    Cleaning Liquid Plant South America

    Doy pouch filling line

    Configuration: Defoamer positioned between filler nozzles & sealer

    Packages

    • Pouch • pouches/min

    Key Metrics

    Filling speed increase %
    35
    Waste reduction per container ml
    4.5
    Reject reduction %
    78

    Benefits

    • Elimination of contamination on the pouch seal
  • Case Study 5

    Cleaning Liquid Plant South America

    Doy pouch filling line

    Configuration: Defoamer positioned between filler nozzles & sealer

    Packages

    • Pouch • 48 → 60 pouches/min

    Key Metrics

    Waste reduction per container ml
    3.5
    Reject reduction %
    15
    Payback (months)
    12

    Benefits

    • Eliminated contamination on the package label and cap seal
    • Eliminated contamination around the star wheel of filler
    • Improved quality for end customer
  • Case Study 6

    Cleaning Liquid Plant Mexico

    Household bottle spray filling line

    Configuration: Defoamer positioned on the star wheel between filler and capper

    Packages

    • Bottle • 100 → 130 bpm

    Key Metrics

    Waste reduction per container ml
    5
    Reject reduction %
    25
    Payback (months)
    12

    Benefits

    • Eliminated contamination on the package label and cap seal
    • Eliminated contamination around the star wheel of filler
    • Improved quality for end customer
  • Case Study 7

    Brewery Plant USA

    Can line, 12 oz and 16 oz

    Configuration: Defoamer positioned on conveyor prior to seamer entrance

    Packages

    • Can • 16 oz • 66000 → 72000 cphr
    • Can • 12 oz • 78000 → 85000 cphr

    Key Metrics

    Beer loss reduction %
    0.6
    Underfill reject reduction %
    35
    TPO reduction %
    20
    CO₂ bubble breakers eliminated
    Yes
    Payback (months)
    12

    Benefits

    • Eliminated contamination on can lids, label and package
  • Case Study 8

    Brewery Plant Colombia

    Can filling line, 500 ml and 330 ml

    Configuration: Defoamer positioned on conveyor prior to seamer entrance

    Packages

    • Can • 500 ml • 120000 cphr
    • Can • 330 ml • 120000 cphr

    Key Metrics

    Beer loss reduction ml per container
    1.7
    Underfill reject reduction %
    15
    Line speed increase to cph
    120000
    TPO reduction %
    10
    CO₂ bubble breakers eliminated
    Yes

    Benefits

    • Increased filling speed from 110,000 to 120,000 cphr
    • Eliminated contamination on the can lids, label and package
  • Case Study 9

    Brewery Plant Europe

    Can line, 500 ml and 330 ml

    Configuration: Defoamer positioned on conveyor prior to seamer entrance

    Packages

    • Can • 500 ml • 66000 → 72000 cphr
    • Can • 330 ml • 78000 → 85000 cphr

    Key Metrics

    Beer loss reduction %
    0.6
    Underfill reject reduction %
    27
    TPO reduction %
    29
    CO₂ bubble breakers eliminated
    Yes
    Payback (months)
    12

    Benefits

    • Eliminated contamination on the can lids, label and package
  • Case Study 10

    Brewery Plant Europe

    FOB/foam control solutions for beer bottling & canning lines

    Key Metrics

    Filling speed increase % range
    5–60
    Extract loss reduction ml range
    1.5–5
    Reject reduction % range
    10–80

    Benefits

    • Reduced waste from beer over-foaming
    • Significant reduction in CO₂ bubble breaker consumption, keeping TPO in specification
    • Quality improvements